Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife FISH AND SHELLFISH SCIENCE

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE REPORT Download Report in PDF Format
Annual Postseason Report 2005-06 Fishing Season:
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

PDF Format - [2.73MB]

Get ADOBE Acrobat Reader

See Also:
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Reports:

NEW! Annual Postseason Report 2005-06 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2004-05 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2003-04 Fishing Season - Comprehensive Management Plan for
Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component

Annual Postseason Report 2005-06 Fishing Season
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook: Harvest Management Component
:
By Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Puget Sound Treaty Indian Tribes*
March 2006

*Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Lower Elwha S'Klallam Tribe, Lummi Nation, Makah Tribe, Muckleshoot Tribe, Nisqually Tribe, Nooksack Tribe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, PuyallupTribe, Sauk-Suiattle Tribe, Skokomish Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe, Suquamish Tribe, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, and Upper Skagit Tribe; Point No Point Treaty Council, Skagit River System Cooperative, and Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.

Executive Summary

Landed Chinook catch was lower than projected in pre-terminal net and troll fisheries in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Georgia – Rosario Strait, in the Nooksack-Samish and South Puget Sound terminal areas. Net catch was slightly higher than projected in the Skagit and Snohomish terminal areas, and substantially higher than expected in Hood Canal.

Natural spawning escapements in the Stillaguamish, Snohomish, Green, White, Puyallup, Mid-Hood Canal, and Hoko rivers were more than 20% below their projected levels. Escapement for the Skagit summer / fall, Cedar, and Elwha river populations were 10% or less below the projected level. Escapement of Nooksack early Chinook, and to the Mid-Hood Canal rivers, were below their critical abundance thresholds. Nonetheless, spawning escapement exceeded the upper management thresholds for Upper Skagit summer, North Fork Stillaguamish, Snoqualmie, White, Nisqually, Skokomish, and Dungeness populations.

Post-season analysis for management years 2000 – 2003 showed that, for most management units, exploitation rates did not exceed the ceilings established by the Harvest Management Plan.

Commercial and recreational catch sampling programs to recover coded-wire tags achieved their objectives in 2004, and substantially exceeded their target rates in many fishing areas. Sampling effort increased in collecting biological samples (i.e. scales or otoliths) from spawning grounds in 2005, with the express purpose of improving the accuracy of age composition.

 


Find a bug or error in the system? Let us know about it!
© 2008 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
E-mail <webmaster@dfw.wa.gov>